Author productivity in a Peruvian communication journal. Application of the generalized inverse power model

Keywords: Bibliometrics, Lotka´s Law, Academic journals, Social communication, Peru

Abstract

The productivity of the authors who published articles in the journal Contratexto, from 1985 to 2022, was analyzed to identify the most productive authors and those who constitute the core of producing authors. For this purpose, a bibliographic database dedicated to the journal was built in the Endnote X9 reference manager; subsequently, the data were exported to Excel and processed in Project R. The productivity of the authors was measured with Lotka’s Law using the generalized inverse power model; the three forms of counting were considered in the analysis of the data: direct, complete, and fractional. The chi-square test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test were used to measure the fit of the observed data to the Lotka distribution for each of the counting methods. The generalized inverse power model for the three counting forms was found to fit Lotka’s distribution. A high concentration of authors with only one article published in the journal in its 38 years of existence was also found; the most productive authors in the studied period are mostly linked to the university that publishes the journal.   ARK CAICYT: http://id.caicyt.gov.ar/ark:/s18511740/vta10dntk  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Biblia Reina-Valera. 2009. Mateo 13:12. Salt Lake City, Utah : La Iglesia de Jesucristo de los Santos de los Últimos Días.

Bookstein, Abraham. 1976. The bibliometric distribution. En Library Quarterly. Vol. 46, no. 4, 416-423.

Cândido, Ricardo Batista, Fábio Gallo Garcia, Anderson Luis Saber Campos y Elmo Tambosi Filho. 2018. Lei de Lotka: um olhar sobre a produtividade dos autores na literatura brasileira de finanças. En Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação. Vol. 23, no. 53, 1-15. <https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2018v23n53p1>

Carvalho, Angelita Alves, Márcia Barroso Fontes y Elisson Alberto Tavares Araújo. 2012. Análise de conteúdo e bibliométrica dos artigos publicados na revista Oikos nos últimos 10 anos. En Oikos: Família e Sociedade em Debate. Vol. 23, no. 2, 3-29. <https://periodicos.ufv.br/oikos/article/view/3632> [Consulta: 21 marzo 2023].

Chaparro, Hernán y Dennis Cuellar-Ascencio. 2022. Investigación académica de la comunicación: un balance de la investigación en comunicación en la Universidad de Lima (2016-2021). En Contratexto. Vol. 3, 125-156. <https://doi.org/10.26439/contratexto2022.n037.5703>

Contratexto. Revista de la Facultad de Comunicación. s.f. Sobre la revista. <https://revistas.ulima.edu.pe/index.php/contratexto/about> [Consulta: 21 marzo 2023].

Das, Prabir Kumar. 2015. Authorship Pattern and Research Collaboration of Journal of Informetrics. En International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology. Vol. 5, no. 1, 53-62. <http://eprints.rclis.org/31973/> [Consulta: 21 marzo 2023].

Dresden, Arnold. 1922. A report on the scientific work of the Chicago section, 1897-1922. En Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. Vol. 28, no. 6, 303-307.

Estrada-Cuzcano, Alonso y Joel Alhuay-Quispe. 2020. Aproximación bibliométrica a la Revista de Comunicación (Perú), 2002-2019. En Revista de Comunicación. Vol. 19, no. 2, 111-124. <https://doi.org/10.26441/RC19.2-2020-A6>

Grothendieck, Gabor, Louis Kates y Thomas Petzoldt. 2016. proto: Prototype Object-Based Programming. R package version 1.0.0. <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=proto> [Consulta: 21 marzo 2023].

Grothendieck, Gabor. 2022. nls2: Non-Linear Regression with Brute Force. R package version 0.3-3. <https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nls2> [Consulta: 21 marzo 2023].

Kumar, P. K. Suresh. 2017. Author productivity and the application of Lotka’s law in LIS publications. En Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS). Vol. 64, no. 4, 234-241. <https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229208203.pdf> [Consulta: 21 marzo 2023].

Lotka, Alfred. 1926. The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. En Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences. Vol. 16, no. 12, 317-323. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/24529203> [Consulta: 21 marzo 2023].

Martínez-Nicolás, Manuel y Ángel Carrasco-Campos. 2018. La transformación de una comunidad científica. Evolución del patrón de autoría de la investigación española sobre comunicación publicada en revistas especializadas (1990-2014). En Revista Latina de Comunicación Social. No. 73, 1368–1383. <https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2018-1311>

Mateus, Julio-César y Claudia Gálvez. 2022. Evolución y desafíos metodológicos en la producción de una revista científica de Comunicación desde la experiencia de Contratexto. 18 p. Trabajo presentado al XVI Congreso de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Investigadores de la Comunicación (ALAIC), realizado en Buenos Aires del 26 al 30 de septiembre de 2022. <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364184549_Evolucion_y_desafios_metodologicos_en_la_produccion_de_una_revista_cientifica_de_Comunicacion_desde_la_experiencia_de_Contratexto> [Consulta: 21 marzo 2023].

McCreery, Laurie S. y Miranda Lee Pao. 1984. Bibliometric analysis of ethnomusicology. En Challenges to an information society : proceedings of the 47th ASIS annual meeting, comp. Barbara Flood, Joanne Witiak and Thomas Hogan. White Plains, New York : Knowledge Industry Publications, Inc. for American Society for Information Science. p. 212-216.

Méndez-Rátiva, Claudia Patricia y Orlando Gregorio-Chaviano. 2014. Aproximación a la comunicación desde la perspectiva teórica y bibliométrica. Un análisis en Web of Science 2008-2012. En Signo y Pensamiento. Vol. 33, no. 64, 114-135. <http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttextypid=S0120-48232014000100008#g2> [Consulta: 21 marzo 2023].

Merton, Robert K. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. En Science. Vol. 159, no. 3810, 56-63. <https://doi.org.10.1126/science.159.3810.56>

Mohanty, Basudev, Jyotshna Sahoo y Nrusingh Kumar Dash. 2018. Bibliometric Indicators for Assessing the Quality of Scholarly Communications: A Case Study on International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems. En Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). No. 2158. <https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2158/> [Consulta: 21 marzo 2023].

Nascimento, Bruna Silva do. 2008. A Questão da Autoria nas Revistas de Comunicação: características e tendências. Porto Alegre : UFRGS-RS,2008. 79 p. Tesinas de Curso de Grado.

Nicholls, Paul Travis. 1989. Bibliometric modeling processes and the empirical validity of Lotka’s law. En Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Vol 40, no. 6, 379-385. <https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198911)40:6<379::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-Q>

Pao, Miranda Lee. 1982. Lotka’s test. En Collection management. Vol. 4, no. 1-2, 111-124. <https://doi.org/10.1300/J105v04n01_08>

Pao, Miranda Lee. 1985. Lotka’s law: a testing procedure. En Information processing y management. Vol. 21, no. 4, 305-320. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(85)90055-X>

Pao, Miranda Lee. 1986. An empirical examination of Lotka’s Law. En Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Vol. 37, no. 1, 26-33. <https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630370105>

Price, Derek de Solla. 1963. Little science, big science. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.

Price, Derek de Solla. 1976. A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. En Journal of the American society for Information science. Vol. 27, no. 5, 292-306 <https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630270505>

Reiter, Ludwig, Egbert Steiner y Ulrich Werner. 1997. Ordnungsstrukturen im Wissenschaftsbetrieb. En Schiepek, G., Tschacher, W., eds. Selbstorganisation in Psychologie und Psychiatrie. Berlin: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag. (Wissenschaftstheorie Wissenschaft und Philosophie. Vol 43). <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91596-2_16>

Ribeiro, Henrique César Melo. 2021. Dez anos de trajetória acadêmica da Revista Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting à luz de sua produção científica. En Revista Ambiente Contábil. Vol. 13, no. 2, 181 – 207. <https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2021v13n2ID22460>

Tunga, Santosh Kumar. 2021. Lotka’s Law and Author Productivity in the Economic Literature: A Citation Study. En Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services. Vol. 11, no.2, 1-8. <https://doi.org/10.51983/ijiss-2021.11.2.2998>

Vanz, Samile Andréa de Souza y Renato Fabiano Matheus. 2000. Analyzing gray literature from postgraduate programs in Social Communication in Brazil: network of influence and citation analysis. <https://www.academia.edu/282354/Analyzing_Gray_Literature_From_Postgraduate_Programs_In_Social_Communication_In_Brazil_Network_of_Influence_and_Citation_Analysis> [Consulta: 21 marzo 2023].

Published
2024-06-08
How to Cite
Castro-Cáceres, M. L., Chávez-Salazar, D. A., & Urbizagástegui-Alvarado, R. (2024). Author productivity in a Peruvian communication journal. Application of the generalized inverse power model. Información, Cultura Y Sociedad, (50), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i50.13510
Section
Articles