Hearing disability in the framework of publications on accessibility and inclusion in Library and Information Science. A systematic review
Abstract
People with disabilities face daily barriers arising from the physical, material, or social environment in which they live. In order to make such an environment fully inclusive, accessibility must be guaranteed, the necessary adaptations must be made, and the abilities of each individual must be recognised. This article shows the results of a research carried out with the aim of checking whether libraries are responding to the needs of users with disabilities. It analyses the scientific production in this field over the last fifty years related to accessibility and inclusion initiatives aimed at guaranteeing access to information for people with disabilities according to the type of disability. This analysis is based on a systematic review of the use of the concepts of “accessibility” and “inclusion” related to “library” in the scientific production in the field of Library and Information Science in the databases of Web of Science, Scopus and Library Science Database, aiming to study the attention paid to people with disabilities and, in particular, to people with hearing disability. ARK CAICYT: http://id.caicyt.gov.ar/ark:/s18511740/mbrx5a7x0Downloads
References
Awais, Sania y Kanwal Ameen. 2015. Information accessibility for students with disabilities: An exploratory study of Pakistan. En Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science. Vol. 20, no. 2, 103-115. <https://mjlis.um.edu.my/index.php/MJLIS/article/view/1768> [Consulta: 03 febrero 2024].
Blanco, Nancy. 2022. Inteligencia cultural y social en Bibliotecología y Ciencia de la Información. En Información, cultura y sociedad. No. 47. <http://dx.doi.org/10.34096/ics.i47.12057>
Cherinet, Yared. 2018. Blended skills and future roles of librarians. En Library Management. Vol. 39, no. 1/2, 93-105. <https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-02-2017-0015>
Convención Internacional sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad. 2006. Ginebra: Naciones Unidas. <https://www.ohchr.org/es/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities>
Copeland, Clayton. 2011. Library and Information Center Accessibility: The Differently-able Patron’s Perspective. En Technical Services Quarterly. Vol. 2, no. 2, 223-241. <https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2011.546281>
Cross, Brady. 2020. Library Computer Workstations for Inclusive College Student Populations. En International Journal of Information, Diversity and Inclusion. Vol. 4, no. 1, 60-83. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/48644525>
Cylke, Frank, Michael Moodie y Robert Fistick. 2007. Serving the Blind and Physically Handicapped in the United States of America. En Library Trends. Vol. 55, no. 4, 796-808. <https://muse.jhu.edu/article/216648>
Degener, Theresia. 2016. Disability in Human Rights Context. En Laws. Vol. 5, no. 3, 35. <https://doi.org/10.3390/laws5030035>
Feizabadi, Mansoureh, Esmaeil Vaziri, Seyed Hosseini, Nazila Akbarfahimi, Ayoub Sakhaei y Leila Ghaneifard. 2020. Library Services Needed by the Disabled in Iran: A Qualitative Study. En Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). No. 4463. <https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4463?utm_source=digitalcommons.unl.edu%2Flibphilprac%2F4463&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages> [Consulta: 03 febrero 2024]
Fernández López, Juan Antonio, María Fernández Fidalgo, Reed Geoffrey, Gerold Stucki y Alarcos Cieza. 2009. Funcionamiento y discapacidad: la clasificación internacional del funcionamiento. En Revista Española de Salud Pública. Vol. 83, no. 6, 775-783. <https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1135-57272009000600002> [Consulta: 03 febrero 2024]
Ferreira, Miguel. 2010. De la minus-valía a la diversidad funcional: un nuevo marco teórico-metodológico. En Política y sociedad. Vol. 47, no. 1, 45-65. <https://www.um.es/discatif/documentos/PyS/4_Ferreira.pdf> [Consulta: 03 febrero 2024]
García Ruiz, Alix y Aleida Fernández Moreno. 2005. La inclusión para las personas con discapacidad: entre la igualdad y la diferencia. En Revista Ciencias de la Salud. Vol. 3, no. 2. <https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=56230213> [Consulta: 03 febrero 2024]
Getts, Erica y Katie Stewart. 2018. Accessibility of distance library services for deaf and hard of hearing users. En Reference Services Review. Vol. 46, no. 3, 439-448. <https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/RSR-03-2018-0032/full/html>
Goodley, Dan. 2017. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinar Introduction. New York: SAGE Publications.
Hahn, Harlan. 1985. Towards a politics of disability: definitions, disciplines, and policies. En The Social Science Journal. Vol. 22, no. 4, 87-105. [Consulta: 03 febrero 2024]
Henry, Abigail, Nicole Prawl y Beverly Lashley. 2019. Give Us Vision, Lest We Perish: Engaging Disability at the National Library of Jamaica. En International Journal of Information, Diversity and Inclusion. Vol. 3, no. 4. <https://doi.org/10.33137/ijidi.v3i4.32997>
Higgins, Julian y Sally Green, ed. 2011. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. (updated March 2011). Reino Unido: The Cochrane Collaboration. [Consulta: 03 febrero 2024]
Jaeger, Paul. 2018. Designing for Diversity and Designing for Disability: New Opportunities for Libraries to Expand Their Support and Advocacy for People with Disabilities. En International Journal of Information, Diversity, and Inclusion. Vol. 2, no. 1/2, 52-66. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/48644839> [Consulta: 03 febrero 2024]
Klassen, Terry, Alejandro Jadad y David Moher. 1998. Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews. I Getting started. En Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. Vol. 152, no. 7, 700-704. <https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.152.7.700>
Kushalnagar, Poorna, Joan Naturale, Raylene Paludneviciene, Scott Smith, Emily Werfel, Richard Doolittle, Stephen Jacobs y James DeCaro. 2015. Health Websites: Accessibility and Usability for American Sign Language Users. En Health Communication. Vol. 30, 830-837. <https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2013.853226>
Linton, Simi. 2010. Reassigning Meaning. En Davis, L. The Disability Studies Reader. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: Routledge.
Martín, Sandra, Marcela Verde, Mariela Rodríguez y María Godoy. 2022. Biblioteca accesible. Servicios y experiencias del Sistema de Bibliotecas de la Universidad Católica de Córdoba. En Información, cultura y sociedad. No. 47. <http://dx.doi.org/10.34096/ics.i47.12033>
Mates, Barbara. 2012. Information Power to All Patrons. En Library Technology Reports. Vol. 48, no. 7, 7-13. <https://www.proquest.com/docview/1178998596/fulltext/3D7BD4C4A6294F62PQ/1?accountid=14514> [Consulta: 03 febrero 2024]
McDonald, Andrew. 2006. The ten commandments revisited: The qualities of good library space. En LIBER Quarterly. Vol. 16, no. 2. <https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.7840>
OMS. 2001. Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud. Ginebra: OMS.
Quinn, Gerard y Theresia Degener. 2002. Derechos Humanos y discapacidad. Uso actual y posibilidades futuras de los instrumentos de derechos humanos de las Naciones Unidas en el contexto de la discapacidad. Ginebra: ONU. <https://www.academia.edu/70508833/Derechos_humanos_y_discapacidad_Uso_actual_y_posibilidades_futuras_de_los_instrumentos_de_derechos_humanos_de_las_Naciones_Unidas_en_el_contexto_de_la_discapacidad> [Consulta: 03 febrero 2024
Salvador Oliván, José A., Gonzalo Marco Cuenca y Rosario Arquero Avilés. 2018. Las revisiones sistemáticas en Biblioteconomía y Documentación: análisis y evaluación del proceso de búsqueda. En Revista Española de Documentación Científica. Vol. 41, no. 2, e207. <https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2018.2.1491>
Salvador Oliván, José A., Gonzalo Marco Cuenca y Rosario Arquero Avilés. 2023. La reproducibilidad de las estrategias de búsqueda en revisiones sistemáticas publicadas en revistas españolas de Biblioteconomía y Documentación. En Ibersid: Revista De Sistemas De información Y documentación. Vol. 17, no. 1, 129–137. <https://doi.org/10.54886/ibersid.v17i1.4892>
Vaden, Mondrea. 2022. CRT, Information, and Disability: An Intersectional Commentary. En Education for Information. Vol. 38, no. 4, 339-346.
Datos de Investigación:
Olmedo Pagés Elena Loreto y Rosario Arquero Avilés. 2024. Apéndice. Discapacidad Auditiva_OlmedoPagés_ArqueroAvilés. Zenodo. <https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10651741>
Copyright (c) 2024 Información, cultura y sociedad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal acknowledge the conditions below:
- Authors retain the copyright of their work while they transfer the right of the first publishing to the journal, under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) Licence, which allows third parties to reproduce them under the condition that express mention is given to the author and to its original publication in the journal.
- Authors may enter into other contractual and independent arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (for instance, it can be published in an institutional repository or in a book). In any case, an express mention should be given to its first publication in the journal.
- It is permitted and encouraged to publish online the articles (for example, on institutional or personal pages).
