Informational Resilience and Political Subjectivation. A discussion on informational practices in digital political contexts
Abstract
Since the rise of the so-called information society, a paradox has emerged: digitally mediated information presents both democratizing potential and a fertile ground for the proliferation of extreme discourses that adapt and persist in digital environments. This phenomenon demonstrates the possibility of influencing both creative and destructive processes in the construction of emerging subjectivities. The aim of this paper is to establish theoretical connections between approaches to digital citizenship, as a form of political subjectivation, and informational resilience as a process capable of sustaining this subjectivation. It is argued that investigating the relationship between them is useful for understanding the social tensions observed in digital political contexts. The expansion of these approaches is suggested to have the potential to broaden the understanding of various emerging political subjectivities. ARK CAICYT: http://id.caicyt.gov.ar/ark:/s18511740/eyt70krodDownloads
References
Abidin, Crystal. 2021. From “networked publics” to “refracted publics”: A companion framework for researching “below the radar” studies. En Social Media + Society. Vol. 7, no. 1. <https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120984458>
Accoto, Cosimo. 2017. Il mondo dato: cinque brevi lezioni di filosofia digitale. Milan: Egea.
Al-Naday, Mays F., Martin J. Reed, Dirk Trossen y Kun Yang. 2014. Information resilience: source recovery in an information-centric network. En IEEE network. Vol. 28, no. 3, 36–42. <https://doi.org/10.1109/MNET.2014.6843230>
American Library Association ALA. 1989. Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: Final Report. Document ID: d6c68ac5-a84a-4035-93ba-e887da74cb6b <https://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/presidential> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Barrios Tao, Hernando. 2015. Subjetividades na ágora digital: Questões para a educação e a bioética. En Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética. Vol. 15, no. 2, 84–95. <https://doi.org/10.18359/rlbi.537>
Bermúdez-Grajales, Mónica María. 2017. Subjetividades juveniles, expresiones políticas y uso de tecnologías digitales. En Praxis & Saber. Vol. 8, no. 17, 155–179. <https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.v8.n17.2018.7205>
Bezerra, Arthur Coelho, Marco Schneider y Gustavo Silva Saldanha. 2019. Competência crítica em informação como crítica à competência em informação. En Informação & sociedade: estudos. Vol. 29, no. 3, 5-22. <https://periodicos.ufpb.br/index.php/ies/article/view/47337> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Blommaert, Jan. 2022. Sociolinguistic restratification in the online-offline nexus: Trump’s viral errors. En Spotti, Massimiliano, Jos Swanenberg y Jan Blommaert, eds. Language Policies and the Politics of Language Practices: Essays in Honour of Sjaak Kroon. Suiza: Springer. p. 7–24.
Brasileiro, Fellipe Sá. 2020. Emoções e redes colaborativas na resiliência informacional. En Liinc em Revista. Vol. 16, no. 2, e5309.
<https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v16i2.5309>
Brown, Wendy. 2019. In the ruins of neoliberalism: The rise of antidemocratic politics in the West. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
Cabezas González, Marcos y Sonia Casillas Martín. 2019. Las educadoras y educadores sociales ante la sociedad red. En Ensaio: Avaliação e políticas públicas em educação. Vol. 27, no. 4, 521–542.
<https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-40362019002701360>
Calzada, Igor. 2022. How digital citizenship regimes are rescaling european nation-states. En Space and Polity. Vol. 26, no. 1, 44–52.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2022.2072197>
Cardoso, Gustavo and Manuel Castells. 2005. A sociedade em rede: do conhecimento à acção política. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional.
Castells, Manuel. 2002. A sociedade em rede. São Paulo: Paz e Terra. Vol. 1.
Castells, Manuel. 2003. A Galáxia Internet: reflexões sobre a Internet, negócios e a sociedade. San Pablo: Zahar.
Ceretta Soria, María Gladys, Magela Cabrera Castiglioni y Javier Canzani Cuello. 2024. Evolución del concepto de alfabetización en información en clave de inclusión social. En Hernández Salazar, Patricia, coord. Desarrollo social: investigación bibliotecológica, información y bibliotecas. México: UNAM. Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas y de la Información. p. 93-110. <https://ru.iibi.unam.mx/jspui/handle/IIBI_UNAM/982> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Chen, Laure Lu, Sheena Mirpuri, Nirmala Rao y Nancy Law. 2021. Conceptualization and measurement of digital citizenship across disciplines. En Educational Research Review. Vol. 33, 100379.
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100379 >
Choi, Moonsun. 2016. A concept analysis of digital citizenship for democratic citizenship education in the internet age. En Theory & research in Social Education. Vol. 44, no. 4: 565–607. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2016.1210549>
Coleman, Stephen. 2008. Foundations of digital government. In Chen, Hsinchun. Digital government: e-government research, case studies, and implementation. New York: Springer. p 3–19. <https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-71611-4_1> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Damarad, Volha. 2020. Information and cyber resilience in Belarus. En Turkish Policy Quarterly. Vo. 19, no. 3, 97-105. <http://transatlanticpolicy.com/article/1037/information-and-cyber-resilience-in-belarus> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Di Felice, Massimo. 2007. As formas digitais do social e os novos dinamismos da sociabilidade contemporânea. En Kunsch, Margarida Maria Krohling y Waldemar Luiz Kunsch, org. Relações públicas comunitárias – a comunicação em uma perspectiva dialógica e transformadora. San Pablo: Summus. p. 29–44.
Di Felice, Massimo. 2021. A cidadania digital: a crise da ideia ocidental de democracia e a participação nas redes digitais. San Pablo: Paulus Editora.
Di Felice, Massimo y Fernanda Cristina Moreira. 2018. Pachamama e a internet of things: para além da ideia ocidental de cidadania. En Lumina. Vol. 12, no. 3, 24–40. <https://doi.org/10.34019/1981-4070.2018.v12.21568>
Dumbrava, Costica. 2017. Citizenship and technology. En Shachar, Ayelet, Rainer Bauböck, Irene Bloemraad y Maarten Vink, eds. Oxford Handbook of Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 767–788.
Feezell, Jessica. T. 2016. Predicting online political participation: The importance of selection bias and selective exposure in the online setting. En Political Research Quarterly. Vol. 69, no. 3, 495–509. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916652503>
Fernández-Prados, Juan S., Antonia Lozano-Díaz y Alexandra Ainz-Galende. 2021. Measuring digital citizenship: A comparative analysis. En Informatics. Vol. 8, no. 1, 18. <https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics8010018>
Ferraz, Tairine Vieira y Diogo Henrique Helal. 2024. Informational resilience: a literature review. En RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação. Vol. 22, e024009. <https://www.scielo.br/j/rdbci/a/vwXC7CrJq4VcbZ8wrqhGCHb/abstract/?lang=en> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Freitas, Christiana Soares, Rafael Cardoso Sampaio y Daniel Pitangueira de Avelino. 2023. Proposta de análise tecnopolítica das inovações democráticas. En Texto para Discussã. <https://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/11514/4/TD_2848_Web.pdf> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Gil Garcia, Javier A. 2016. Tecnopolítica vs tecnocensura. La evolución de la praxis política. Video de Alberto Escorcia. <http://contenidosdigitales.uned.es/fez/view/intecca:VideoAVIP-210272> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Gomes, Wilson. 2011. Participação política online: Questões e hipóteses de trabalho. En Internet e participação política no Brasil. Porto Alegre: Sulina. p 19–45.
González Rey, Fernando. 2012. La subjetividad y su significación para el estudio de los procesos políticos: sujeto, sociedad y política. En Subjetividades políticas: desafíos y debates latinoamericanos. Bogotá: Instituto para la Investigación Educativa y el Desarrollo Pedagógico – IDEP. <https://descubridor.idep.edu.co/Record/ir-001-2170> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Guareschi, Pedrinho. 2018. Psicologia e pós-verdade: a emergência da subjetividade digital. En Psi Unisc. Vol. 2, no. 2, 19–34.
<https://doi.org/10.17058/psiunisc.v2i2.12242>
Hanakata, Naomi C. y Filippo Bignami. 2023. Platform urbanization, its recent acceleration, and implications on citizenship. The case of Singapore. En Citizenship Studies. Vol. 27, no. 2, 189-209.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2022.2077568>
Hicks, Alison y Annemaree Lloyd. 2022. Agency and liminality during the covid-19 pandemic: Why information literacy cannot fix vaccine hesitancy. En Journal of Information Science. Vol. 50, no. 6, 1557-1572.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221124003>
Hopp, Toby y Patrick Ferrucci. 2020. A spherical rendering of deviant information resilience. En Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. Vol. 97, no. 2, 492–508. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020916428>
Isin, Engin y Evelyn Ruppert. 2020. Being digital citizens. Washington, D.C.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Latour, Bruno. 2000. Ciência em ação: como seguir cientistas e engenheiros sociedade afora. San Pablo: Unesp.
Leonnel, André Costa Monteiro, Dany Flávio Tonelli, Paulo Henrique Montagnana Vicente Leme y Julia Moretto Amâncio. 2018. Limites e possibilidades da interação sociopolítica entre sociedade e Câmara dos Deputados pelo portal eletrônico e-Democracia. En Administração Pública e Gestão Social. Vol. 10, no. 3, 213–221. <https://periodicos.ufv.br/apgs/article/view/5280> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Lloyd, Annemaree. 2013. Building information resilient workers: the critical ground of workplace information literacy. What have we learnt? In World- wide Commonalities and Challenges in Information Literacy Research and Practice: European Conference on Information Literacy, ECIL 2013. (Istanbul, Turkey: 22-25 octubre, 2013) Revised Selected Papers 1. Suiza: Springer. p 219–228.
Lloyd, Annemaree. 2014a. Building information resilience: how do resettling refugees connect with health information in regional landscapes– implications for health literacy. En Australian Academic & Research Libraries. Vol. 45, no. 1, 48–66. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2014.884916>
Lloyd, Annemaree. 2014b. Following the red thread of information in information literacy research: Recovering local knowledge through interview to the double. En Library & information Science research. Vol. 36, no. 2, 99-105. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2013.10.006>
Lloyd, Annemaree. 2015. Stranger in a strange land; enabling information resilience in resettlement landscapes. En Journal of Documentation. Vol. 71, no. 5, 1029–1042. <https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2014-0065>
Lloyd, Annemaree. 2020. Shaping the contours of fractured landscapes: Extending the layering of an information perspective on refugee resettlement. En Information Processing & Management. Vol. 57, no. 3, 102062.
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102062>
Lloyd, Annemaree, Suzanne Lipu y Mary Anne Kennan. 2016. On becoming citizens: Examining social inclusion from an information perspective. En Australian Academic & Research Libraries. Vol. 47, no. 4, 304–315.
<https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2016.1256806>
Lynn, Theo, Pierangelo Rosati, Edel Conway, Declan Curran, Grace Fox y Colm O’Gorman. 2022. The digital citizen. En Digital Towns: Accelerating and Measuring the Digital Transformation of Rural Societies and Economies. London: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 23–47. <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91247-5>
Lythreatis, Sophie, Sanjay Kumar Singh y Abdul-Nasser El-Kassar. 2022. The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. En Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 175, 121359. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359>
Mandarano, Lynn, Mahbubur Meenar y Christopher Steins. 2010. Building social capital in the digital age of civic engagement. En Journal of planning literature. Vol. 25, no. 2, 123–135. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412210394102>
Marshall, Thomas H. 1967. Cidadania, classe social e status. San Pablo: Zahar.
Marzochi, Samira Feldman. 2022. Cyberspace and decentering: Subjectivity as a matter of space and time. En Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política. No. 115, 151–190. <https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-151190/115>
Masuda, Yonegi. 1980. A sociedade da informação: como sociedade pós-industrial. San Pablo: Ed. Rio.
Medeiros, Jackson da Silva. 2019. Subjetividades digitais: micropolíticas info-comunicacionais e uma introdução programática. En Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends. Vol. 13, no. 2, 26–35.
<https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2019.v13n2.03.p26>
Morozov, Evgeny. 2014. The rise of data and the death of politics. En The Guardian. 20 de julio. <https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/20/rise-of-data-death-of-politics-evgeny-morozov-algorithmic-regulation> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Mossberger, Karen, Caroline J. Tolbert y Ramona S. McNeal. 2007. Digital citizenship: The Internet, society, and participation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Nogueira, Marco A. 2007. Bem mais que pós-moderno: poder, sociedade civil e democracia na modernidade periférica radicalizada. En Ciências Sociais Unisinos. Vol. 43, no. 1, 46-56. <https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/938/93843105.pdf> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Norris, Pippa y Ronald Inglehart. 2019. Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Organização Pan-Americana da Saúde – OPAS. 2020. Entenda a infodemia e a desinformação na luta contra a COVID-19. Brasilia, DF: OPAS. <https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/52054/Factsheet-Infodemic_por.pdf> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Oser, Jennifer. 2017. Assessing how participators combine acts in their “political tool kits”: A person-centered measurement approach for analyzing citizen participation. En Social Indicators Research. Vol. 133, 235–258.
<https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1364-8>
Paixão, Pablo B. S., Aurora Cuevas-Cerveró y Ronaldo N. Linhares. 2022. A alfabetização informacional para uma educação libertadora: uma abordagem transdisciplinar entre a Ciência da Informação e a Educação. En Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciência da Informação. Vol. 15, no. 2, 534-551. <https://doi.org/10.26512/rici.v15.n2.2022.39495>
Palmieri, Emerson Rodrigues da Cunha. 2023. Social media, echo chambers and contingency: a system theoretical approach about communication in the digital space. En Kybernetes. Vol. 53, no. 8, 2593-2604.
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2022-1650>
Patent, Volker. 2022. Dysfunctional trusting and distrusting: Integrating trust and bias perspectives. En Journal of Trust Research. Vol. 12, no. 1, 66–93. <https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2022.2113887>
Polizzi, Gianfranco. 2023. Internet users’ utopian/dystopian imaginaries of society in the digital age: Theorizing critical digital literacy and civic engagement. En New media & society. Vol. 25, no. 6, 1205–1226.
<https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211018609>
Putnam, Robert. 2020. Bowling alone: Revised and updated. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Nueva York: Simon & Schuster.
Raisio, Harri, Alisa Puustinen, Juha Lindell, Tarja Wiikinkoski y Vesa Valtonen. 2023. Could virtual volunteerism enhance information resilience in a nuclear emergency? the potential role of disaster knowledge workers and virtual emergent groups. En Radioprotection. Vol. 58, no. 1, 11 - 18. <https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2023003>
Rak, Jacek, Magnus Jonsson, David Hutchison y James P. Sterbenz. 2017. Disciplines and measures of information resilience. En 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON). (19º: 2-6 julio 2017: Girona, España). Madrid: IEEE. p. 1–4. IEEE. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2017.8024996>
Ribble, Mike y Gerald D. Bailey. 2011. Digital citizenship in schools. international society for technology in education. Washington D.C.: International Society for Technology in Education
Rueda Ortiz, Rocío. 2010. Ciudadanías, política y tecnologías: lo (im)posible de otras formas de lo común. En Comunicación y ciudadanía. No. 3, 6–19. <https://revistas.uexternado.edu.co/index.php/comciu/article/view/2015> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Ruokolainen, Hilda y Gunilla Widén. 2020. Conceptualising misinformation in the context of asylum seekers. En Information Processing & Management. Vol. 57, no. 3, 102127. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102127>
Sassen, Saskia. 2005. The repositioning of citizenship and alienage: Emergent subjects and spaces for politics. En Globalizations. Vol. 2, no. 1, 79–94. <https://doi.org/10.1080/14747730500085114>
Savolainen, Reijo. 2007. Information behavior and information practice: reviewing the “umbrella concepts” of information-seeking studies. En The library quarterly. Vol. 77, no. 2, 109-132. <https://doi.org/10.1086/517840>
Schou, Jannick y Morten Hjelholt. 2018. Digital citizenship and neoliberalization: governing digital citizens in Denmark. En Citizenship Studies. Vol. 22, no. 5, 507–522. <https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1477920>
Vasilis Sourlas Psaras, Onur Ascigil, Ioannis Psaras y George Pavlou. 2018. Enhancing information resilience in disruptive information-centric networks. En IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management. Vol. 15, no. 2, 746–760. <https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2018.2811944 >
Souza, Jessé. 2018. Subcidadania brasileira: para entender o país além do jeitinho brasileiro. Alfragide, Portugal: Leya.
Suaiden, Emir José. 2012. A alfabetização Informativa e a inclusão na sociedade da informação. En Hernández Salazar, Patricia, coord. Tendencias de la Alfabetización Informativa en Iberoamérica. México: UNAM, Centro Universitario de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas. <https://ru.iibi.unam.mx/jspui/handle/IIBI_UNAM/L56> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Tabasso, Nicole. 2019. Diffusion of multiple information: On information resilience and the power of segregation. En Games and Economic Behavior. Vol. 118, 219–240. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2019.09.003>
Toffler, Alvin y Heidi Toffler. 1995. Criando uma nova civilização: a política da 3ª onda. Rio de Janeiro: Record.
Tomasello, Federico. 2023. From industrial to digital citizenship: rethinking social rights in cyberspace. En Theory and society. Vol. 52, 463–486. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-022-09480-6>
Toyoda, Yusuke. 2021. Survey paper: achievements and perspectives of community resilience approaches to societal systems. En Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science. Vol. 5, no. 3, 705–756. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-021-00202-x>
Travkina, Natalia. 2022. Digitization of society: Alternative projections of the future. En Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Vol. 92, no. 6, S483–S491. <https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331622120115>
Udupa, Sahana y Matti Pohjonen. 2019. Extreme speech— extreme speech and global digital cultures—introduction. En International Journal of Communication. Vol. 13, 3049–3067. <https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/9102> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Vitorino, Elizete Vieira y Daniela Piantola. 2011. Dimensões da competência informacional. En Ciência da Informação. Vol. 40, no. 1, 99-110.
<https://revista.ibict.br/ciinf/article/view/1328> [Consulta: 15 julio 2024].
Wei, Kwok-Kee, Hock-Hai Teo, Hock Chuan Chan and Bernard C. Y. Tan. 2011. Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. En Information Systems Research. Vol. 22, no. 1, 170–187.
<https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0273>
Welsh, Marc. 2014. Resilience and responsibility: governing uncertainty in a complex world. En The geographical journal. Vol. 180, no. 1, 15–26.
<https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12012>
Copyright (c) 2024 Información, cultura y sociedad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing in this journal acknowledge the conditions below:
- Authors retain the copyright of their work while they transfer the right of the first publishing to the journal, under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) Licence, which allows third parties to reproduce them under the condition that express mention is given to the author and to its original publication in the journal.
- Authors may enter into other contractual and independent arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (for instance, it can be published in an institutional repository or in a book). In any case, an express mention should be given to its first publication in the journal.
- It is permitted and encouraged to publish online the articles (for example, on institutional or personal pages).
