RDA and ISBD: History of a relationship
Abstract
The article attempts to clarify the nature of the relationship between RDA and ISBD standards in order to be able to understand their differences and links, as well as remove some misinterpretations about this relationship. To this end, some aspects that can affect their differences, such as type of standards, points of view, scope, origin, policies of creation and development group or organization in charge that logically justify those differences, are analyzed. They have not presented any obstacle for a right relationship with the help of the Linked Data technology. In the article, account is also given to mappings and alignments work between both standards in order to properly contribute to the Semantic Web. This knowledge is the basic requirement for current catalogers in order to use standards judiciously, with knowledge and responsibility.Downloads
References
American Library Association. 2003. ALA Standards Manual. <http://www.ala.org/tools/guidelines/standardsmanual/manual#1.1> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Bianchini, Carlo y Mauro Guerrini. 2014. RDA: Resource Description and Access. Il nuovo standard per la metadatazione e la scoperta delle risorse nell’era digitale». En Biblioteche oggi. Vol. 32, no. 4, 46-48. <http://www.bibliotecheoggi.it/2014/20140404701.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Cyganiak, Richard y Anja Jentzsch. 2014. Linking Open Data cloud diagram. <http://lod-cloud.net/> [Con-sulta: 17 enero 2016].
Dunsire, Gordon. 2013a. ISBD unconstrained elements and other extensions. <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/isbdrg/isbd-extensions.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Dunsire, Gordon. 2013b. Resource (ISBD) and Work, Expression, Manifestation, Item (FRBRer) semantic relationship. <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/isbd/OtherDocumentation/resource-wemi.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Dunsire, Gordon. 2015. Outcomes of the 2015 JSC Meeting, RSC/Outcomes/2015. <http://www.rda-rsc.org/sites/all/files/RSC-Outcomes-2015.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Gentili-Tedeschi, Massimo; Françoise Leresche; Dorothy McGarry y Elena Escolano Rodríguez. 2013. ISBD Profile in RDA: Constructing Functionally Interoperable Core Records, Version 1.0. <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/isbd/OtherDocumentation/isbd_profile_in_rda_ver_1.0.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
IFLA. Cataloguing Section. 1996. Names of persons: national usages for entry in catalogues. München: K.G. Saur. <http://www.ifla.org/node/4953> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
IFLA. Cataloguing Section. Standing Committee. 2013. Minutes. Appendix III: ISBD Strategy. En IFLA Gen-eral Conference (79th: 17-23 August 2013: Singapore) p. 22-23 <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/reports/meeting_2013.pdf> [Consulta: 18 enero 2016].
IFLA. Committee on Standards. 2014. What is an IFLA Standard? <http://www.ifla.org/node/8721> [Consul-ta: 11 enero 2016].
IFLA. ISBD Linked Data Study Group. 2014. Minutes of the ISBD Linked Data Study Group’s Meeting. Paris: Bibliothèque Nationale de France. <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/isbdrg/isbd-ld-minutes_042014.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
IFLA. ISBD Review Group. 2012. Alignment of the ISBD element set with RDA element set – RDA, Appendix D.1. 6JSC/ISBD/Discussion/1. <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/isbd/OtherDocumentation/ISBD%20to%20JSC%20discussion%20paper%201.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
IFLA. ISBD Review Group. 2015. Alignment of the ISBD: International Standard Bibliographic Description element set with RDA: Resource Description & Access element set <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/isbd/OtherDocumentation/isbd2rda_alignment_v3_1.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
IFLA. ISBD Review Group. 2016. Grupo de Estudio de ISBD Linked Data. <http://www.ifla.org/node/1795> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
IFLA. ISBD Review Group. ISSN Network. Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. 2011. Har-monization Meeting. <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/isbdrg/JSC_ISBD_ISSN_Outcomesfinal.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
IFLA. ISBD-XML Study Group. 2013. Alignments between the namespaces of ISBD, other IFLA standards, and external standards. <http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/cataloguing/isbdrg/namespace-alignments_v1_20130725.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
ISO. Consumers and Standards: Partnership for a Better World. <http://www.iso.org/sites/ConsumersStandards/1_standards.html#section1_1> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Ohio Department of Education. 2015. Ohio’s Learning Standards - Terminology Definitions. <http://education.ohio.gov/Topics/Ohios-Learning-Standards/Ohios-Learning-Standards/Ohio-Learning-Standards-Resources/Ohio-Learning-Standards-Terminology> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Professional Learning Board. 2015. What is the Difference between Content Standards and Performance Standards? <http://k12teacherstaffdevelopment.com/tlb/what-is-the-difference-between-content-standards-and-performance-standards/> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
RDA Registry. 2015. RDA maps. <http://www.rdaregistry.info/Maps/#isbdrda> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
RDA Steering Committee RSC. Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. 2011. Mapping ISBD and RDA element sets: briefing/discussion paper. 6JSC/Chair/4. <http://www.rda-jsc.org/archivedsite/docs/6JSC-Chair-4.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
RDA Steering Committee RSC. Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. 2013. First issue v. latest (current) issue: Discussion paper: 6JSC/DNB/Discussion/1 <http://www.rda-jsc.org/archivedsite/docs/6JSC-DNB-Discussion-1.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
RDA Steering Committee RSC. 2014a. Protocol between the JSC and the ISBD Review Group (6JSC/Chair/13 14. <http://www.rda-jsc.org/archivedsite/docs/6JSC-Chair-13.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
RDA Steering Committee RSC. 2014b. Revision of RDA 2.3.1.7 (Titles of Parts, Sections, and Supplements) and RDA 2.3.2.6 (Collective Title and Titles of Individual Contents): 6JSC/CCC/11/Sec final/rev. <http://www.rda-jsc.org/archivedsite/docs/6JSC-CCC-11-Sec-final-rev.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
RDA Steering Committee RSC. 2015. RDA elements. 6JSC/RDA/Element analysis table/rev/3. <http://rda-jsc.org/sites/all/files/6JSC-RDA-element-analysis-table-rev-3.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
RIMMF. 2016. RDA in Many Metadata Formats. RIMMF site. <http://www.marcofquality.com/wiki/rimmf3/doku.php?id=rimmf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Spivack, Nova. 2014a. New Era in Semantic Web History. <http://www.dataversity.net/nova-spivack-new-era-semantic-web-history/> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Spivack, Nova. 2014b. A Turning Point for the Semantic Web. <http://www.novaspivack.com/uncategorized/2014-a-turning-point-for-the-semantic-web> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Tillett, Barbara. 2008. Resource Description and Access: Background / Overview. Library of Congress. <http://www.loc.gov/today/cyberlc/feature_wdesc.php?rec=4320> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
University of Ottawa: JuryGlobe. World Legal Systems Research Group Wikipedia. 2016a. Graph distribution of the world population (%) per legal systems. <http://www.juriglobe.ca/eng/syst-demo/graph.php> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
University of Ottawa: JuryGlobe. World Legal Systems Research Group Wikipedia. 2016b. World map. <http://www.juriglobe.ca/eng/rep-geo/cartes/monde.php> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Bibliografía Consultada
ISBD: International standard bibliographic description. 2011. Berlin; München: De Gruyter Saur
Maxwell, Robert L. 2010. RDA in depth: differences between RDA and AACR2. <http://www.rda-jsc.org/docs/RDA_part_2_201005.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
RDA Steering Committee RSC. 2016. Differences between RDA and AACR2. <http://www.rda-jsc.org/archivedsite/docs/6-CREPUQ-Differences-between-RDA-and-AACR2-Paradis.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
RDA Steering Committee RSC. 2016. Submitting Proposals to Revise RDA. <http://www.rda-rsc.org/submitting-proposals> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Schiff, Adam L. 2012. Changes from AACR2 to RDA: A Comparison of Examples. Part 1: Description. <http://faculty.washington.edu/aschiff/UW2012Presentation-Part1-Notes.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Schiff, Adam L. 2012. Changes from AACR2 to RDA: A Comparison of Examples. Part 2: Access Points. <http://faculty.washington.edu/aschiff/UW2012Presentation-Part2-Notes.pdf> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016]
Tillett, Barbara. 2010. RDA changes from AACR2 for texts. <http://www.rda-jsc.org/archivedsite/docs/10_1_12_RDAchangesfromAACR2fortexts.ppt> [Consulta: 11 enero 2016].
Authors publishing in this journal acknowledge the conditions below:
- Authors retain the copyright of their work while they transfer the right of the first publishing to the journal, under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) Licence, which allows third parties to reproduce them under the condition that express mention is given to the author and to its original publication in the journal.
- Authors may enter into other contractual and independent arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (for instance, it can be published in an institutional repository or in a book). In any case, an express mention should be given to its first publication in the journal.
- It is permitted and encouraged to publish online the articles (for example, on institutional or personal pages).
