Who chooses my diet? The automated notification of people in the digital environment
Abstract
From the theoretical point of view, this work analyzes how technology configures the new digital environment, as a space of information flow that gives meaning to our relationship with the world and; the development of our digital identity as subjects in development that mean in the digital experience. In this context, search engines, as cultural software, offer a personalized information diet, providing answers to queries by means of biased results, elaborated from the behavior patterns of the subjects, demystifying the global access to information.Downloads
References
Baeza-Yates, Ricardo. 2018. Bias on the web. En Communications of the ACM. Vol. 61, no. 6, 54- 61. <https://doi.org/10.1145/3209581>
Baeza-Yates, Ricardo. 2020. Bias in search and recommender systems. En Fourteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys ’20). p. 2. <https://doi.org/10.1145/3383313.3418435>
Balabantaray, Rakesh. 2017. Evaluation of web search engine based on ranking of results and its features. En International Journal of Information and Communication Technology. Vol.10, no. 4, 392- 405. <https://doi.org/10.1504/IJICT.2017.084337>
Bazarova, Natalya y Yoon Hyung Choi. 2014. Self-disclosure in social media: Extending the functional approach to disclosure motivations and characteristics on social network sites. En Journal of Communication. Vol. 64, no.4, 635-657. <https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12106>
Boyd, Dana, Karen Levy y Alice Marwick. 2014. The networked nature of algorithmic discrimination. En Data and Discrimination: Collected Essays. Open Technology Institute. <http://www.danah.org/papers/2014/DataDiscrimination.pdf> [Consulta: 10 agosto 2019].
Cachorro, Gabriel. 2008. Cuerpo y subjetividad: Rasgos, configuraciones y proyecciones. En Jornadas de Cuerpo y Cultura de la UNLP. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Departamento de Educación Física. <http://www.memoria.fahce.unlp.edu.ar/trab_eventos/ev.697/ev.697.pdf> [Consulta: 10 agosto 2019].
Cano-Orón, Lorena. 2019. Dr. Google, what can you tell me about homeopathy? Comparative study of the top10 websites in the United States, United Kingdom, France, Mexico and Spain. En El profesional de la información. Vol. 28, no. 2. <https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.mar.13>
Castells, Manuel. 2009. Comunicación y Poder. Madrid: Alianza.
Chander, Anupam. 2016. The racist algorithm. En Michigan Law Review. Vol. 115, no. 6. <http://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol115/iss6/13> [Consulta: 8 agosto 2019].
Chen, Hung-Jui, Lin, Hung-Jung, Wu, Mei-Chen, Tang, Hung-Jen, Su, Bo-An, y Lai, Chin-Cheng. 2021. The implementation of an active surveillance integrating information technology and drive-through coronavirus testing station for suspected COVID-19 cases. En Journal of Infection. Vol. 82, no. 2, 282-327.
Druin, Allison, Elizabeth Foss, Leshell Hatley, Evan Golub, Mona Leigh Guha, Jerry Fails y Hilary Hutchinson. 2009. How children search the internet with keyword interfaces. En IDC ‘09: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. p. 89-96. <https://doi.org/10.1145/1551788.1551804>
Duarte Torres, Sergio, Djoerd Hiemstra, Ingmar Weber y Pavel Serdyukov. 2012. Query recommendation for children. En CIKM ’12: Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. p. 2010-2014. ACM. <https://doi.org/10.1145/2396761.2398562>
Foo, Schubert, Shaheen Majid, Intan Azura Mokhtar, Xue Zhang, Yung-Ke Chang, Brendan Luyt y Yin-Leng Theng. 2014. Information literacy skills of secondary school students in Singapore. En Aslib Journal of Information Management. Vol. 66, no.1, 54-76.<https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-08-2012-0066>
Fornas Carrasco, Ricardo. 2003. La cara oculta de Internet. En Hipertext.net. No. 1.<http://goo.gl/G6DMkh> [Consulta: 8 agosto 2019].
García-Canclini, Néstor. 2004. Diferentes, desiguales y desconectados: mapas de la interculturalidad. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Gehl, Robert. 2014. Power/freedom on the dark web: A digital ethnography of the Dark Web Social Network. En New Media & Society. Vol.18, no. 7, 1219-1235.<https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814554900>
Han, Byung-Chul. 2013. La Sociedad de la Transparencia. Barcelona: Herder.
Han, Byung-Chul. 2014a. En el Enjambre. Barcelona: Herder.
Han, Byung-Chul. 2014b. Psicopolítica. Barcelona: Herder.
Ho, H. J., Wei Yang Lim, Brenda Ang y Amanda Chow. 2021. Use of surveillance technology to enhance exposure management for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. En The Journal of Hospital Infection. Vol. 107, 101-02.
Igual, Laura y Santi Seguí. 2017. Introduction to Data Science. En Introduction to Data Science: A Python Approach to Concepts, Techniques and Applications. Chan: Springer. p. 1-4.
Jenkins, Henry, Sam Ford y Joshua Green. 2015. Cultura transmedia: la creación de contenido y valor en una cultura en red. Barcelona: GEDISA.
Jiang, Min. 2014a. Search concentration, bias, and parochialism: A comparative study of Google, Baidu, and Jike’s search results from China. En Journal of communication. Vol. 64, no. 6, 1088-1110.<https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12126>
Jiang, Min. 2014b. The business and politics of search engines: A comparative study of Baidu and Google’s search results of Internet events in China. En New media & society. Vol.16, no. 2, 212-233. <https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813481196>
Just, Natascha y Michael Latzer. 2017. Governance by algorithms: reality construction by algorithmic selection on the Internet. En Media, Culture & Society. Vol.39, no. 2, 238- 258. <https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716643157>
Kuhlthau, Carol. 1991. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user’s perspective. En Journal of the American Society for Information. Vol.42, no. 5, 361- 371.
Li, Xiaohui y Hongbin Dong. 2020. An Oligopoly Two-Stage-Game Model for Investigating the Search Engine Market. En International Journal of Performability Engineering. Vol. 16, no. 1, 1781-1792.<https://doi.org/10.23940/ijpe.20.11.p10.17811792>
Llorca-Abad, Germán. 2012. Exclusión digital y límites de la comunicación mediada. En Trípodos. Vol.31, 111-123.<http://goo.gl/aCLasz > [Consulta: 12 agosto 2019]
Lodder, Arno, y Ronald Loui. 2018. Data algorithms and privacy in surveillance: On stages, numbers and the human factor. En Barfield W. y Pagallo U, ed. Research handbook on the law of artificial intelligence. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 375-384.
Manovich, Lev. 2013 [2012]. El Software toma el mando. Traducción de Software Takes Command (versión del 30 de septiembre de 2012, publicada bajo licencia Creative Commons en manovich.net) por Everardo Reyes-García.
Marchionini, Gary. 2006. Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. En Communications of the ACM. Vol. 49, no. 4, 41- 46. <https://www.inf.unibz.it/~ricci/ISR/papers/p41-marchionini.pdf>; [Consulta: 27 junio 2020].
Marjanovic, Olivera y Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic. 2017. Exploring the tension between transparency and datification effects of open government IS through the lens of Complex Adaptive Systems. En The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. Vol. 26, no. 3, 210-232.
Mattelart, Armand. 2007. Historia de la sociedad de la información. Barcelona: Paidós.
Ni Loideain, Nóra y Rachel Adams. 2020. From Alexa to Siri and the GDPR: the gendering of virtual personal assistants and the role of data protection impact assessments. En Computer Law & Security Review. Vol. 36, 105366. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105366>
Page, Lawrence y Sergey Brin, Rajeev Motwani y Terry Winograd. 1999. The PageRank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Technical Report. Stanford InfoLab. <http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/422/> [Consulta: 27 junio 2020].
Palmiotto, Francesca. 2021. The Black Box on Trial: The Impact of Algorithmic Opacity on Fair Trial Rights in Criminal Proceedings. En Ebers M., Cantero Gamito M., eds. Algorithmic Governance and Governance of Algorithms. Cham: Springer. p. 49-70. <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50559-2_3>
Pariser, Eli. 2017. El filtro burbuja: Cómo la web decide lo que leemos y lo que pensamos. Barcelona: Taurus.
Pasquale, Frank. 2015. The black box society. Londres: Harvard University Press.
Pasquinelli, Matteo. 2016. The spike: On the growth and form of pattern police. En Stephanie Hankey, Marek Tuszynski and Anselm Franke, eds. Nervous Systems. Berlin: HKW/ Spector books. p. 276-291.
Qureshi, Ambrina, Syed Bokhari, Madiha Pirvani y Narendar Dawani. 2015. Understanding and practice of evidence based search strategy among postgraduate dental students: a preliminary study. En The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice. Vol. 15, no. 2, 44-49.<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2014.08.002 >
Rasmussen, Edie. 2003. Indexing and retrieval for the Web. En Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST). Vol. 37, 91-124.
Rosman, Tom, Anne-Kathrin Mayer y Günter Krampen. 2015. Combining self-assessments and achievement tests in information literacy assessment: empirical results and recommendations for practice. En Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Vol. 40, no. 5, 740–754.
Sadikov, Eldar, Jayant Madhavan, Lu Wang y Alon Halevy. 2010. Clustering query refinements by user intent. En WWW ‘10: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web. p. 841–850.<https://doi.org/10.1145/1772690.1772776>
Santos Jr, Eugene, Hien Nguyen, Qunhua Zhao y Hua Wang. 2003. User modelling for intent prediction in information analysis. En Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. Vol. 47, no. 8, 1034-1038. Sage CA: Los Angeles,<https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120304700818>
Sastre Domínguez, Paz y Ángel Juan Gordo López. 2019. Data activism versus algorithmic control. New governance models, old asymmetries. En Revista Científica de Información y Comunicación. No. 16, 157-182.
Şendurur, Emine y Zahide Yildirim. 2015. Students’ Web Search Strategies With Different Task Types: An Eye-Tracking Study. En International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. Vol. 31, no. 2, 101-111.<https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.959105>
Sibilia, Paula. 2005. El hombre postorgánico: cuerpo, subjetividad y tecnologías digitales. Argentina: FCE.
Sibilia, Paula. 2012. La intimidad como espectáculo. Argentina: FCE.
Siles, Ignacio, Johan Espinoza-Rojas, Adrián Naranjo y María Fernanda Tristán. 2019. The mutual domestication of users and algorithmic recommendations on Netflix. En Communication, Culture & Critique. Vol. 12, no. 4, 499-518.
Steiner, Miriam, Melanie Magin, Birgit Stark y Stefan Geiß. 2020. Seek and you shall find? A content analysis on the diversity of five search engines’ results on political queries. En Information, Communication & Society. 1-25. <https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1776367>
Tello-Díaz, Lucía. 2013. Intimidad y «extimidad» en las redes sociales. Las demarcaciones éticas de Facebook. En Comunicar. Vol. 21, no. 41, 205-213.<http://dx.doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-20>
Vásquez Rocca, Adolfo. 2016. Byung-Chul Han: la sociedad de la transparencia, psicopolítica y autoexplotación neoliberal: de lo viral-inmunológico a lo neuronal-estresante. En Reflexiones Marginales. No. 31.<https://reflexionesmarginales.com.mx/blog/2016/01/29/byung-chul-han-2/> [Consulta: 12 agosto 2019].
Xing, Wenpu y Ali Ghorbani. 2004. Weighted pagerank algorithm. En Proceedings.Second Annual Conference on Communication Networks and Services Research, IEEE. p. 305-314. <https://doi.org/10.1109/DNSR.2004.1344743>
Yamamoto, Yusuke, Takehiro Yamamoto, Hiroaki Ohshima y Hiroshi Kawakami. 2018. Web access literacy scale to evaluate how critically users can browse and search for web information. En WebSci ’18: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science p. 97-106.<https://doi.org/10.1145/3201064.3201072>
Yoganarasimhan, H. 2020. Search personalization using machine learning. En Management Science. Vol. 66, no. 3, 1045-1070. <https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3255>
Authors publishing in this journal acknowledge the conditions below:
- Authors retain the copyright of their work while they transfer the right of the first publishing to the journal, under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) Licence, which allows third parties to reproduce them under the condition that express mention is given to the author and to its original publication in the journal.
- Authors may enter into other contractual and independent arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (for instance, it can be published in an institutional repository or in a book). In any case, an express mention should be given to its first publication in the journal.
- It is permitted and encouraged to publish online the articles (for example, on institutional or personal pages).
