Evaluation processes of scientific papers

  • Susana Romanos de Tiratel Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas-INIBI, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UBA. Puán 480, 4º piso, oficina 8. C1406CQJ Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i14.885
Keywords: Scientific reseach, Scientific articles, Scientific evaluation

Abstract

The author discusses the double-blind arbitration, for the evaluation of work submitted to journals, as one of the most widely accepted validation procedures in the field of scientific research. She explains how this kind of management procedural is in information, cultura y sociedad: revista del Instituto de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas (FFyL-UBA). From the perspective of certain questions raised about this procedure., the evaluation system has some slow changes in harmony with the changes in the modes of scientific communication: open files with voluntary assessments, reliance on editorial boards for the selection of items. The advantages are the democratization of knowledge and speed of publication. Without denying that traditional evaluation can't stop kidnappings, frauds or arbitrariness, it is stated that so far has been effective, especially when it guarantees the anonymity of those involved in the process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2006-06-01
How to Cite
Romanos de Tiratel, S. (2006). Evaluation processes of scientific papers. Información, Cultura Y Sociedad, (14), 5-10. https://doi.org/10.34096/ics.i14.885
Issue
No 14 (2006)
Section
Editorial

Authors publishing in this journal acknowledge the conditions below:

  1. Authors retain the copyright of their work while they transfer the right of the first publishing to the journal, under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) Licence, which allows third parties to reproduce them under the condition that express mention is given to the author and to its original publication in the journal.
  2. Authors may enter into other contractual and independent arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (for instance, it can be published in an institutional repository or in a book). In any case, an express mention should be given to its first publication in the journal.
  3. It is permitted and encouraged to publish online the articles (for example, on institutional or personal pages).

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>