Reflections on the changing sphere of social reproduction and class struggle: cases from Peru and Spain

  • Gavin Smith Universidad de Toronto Maynooth University
Keywords: Social reproduction, Class strugle, Livelihood, Work, Politics

Abstract

What does the term “social reproduction” refer to? I suggest at the beginning of this article first that, despite its common use, we use the term to cover quite different and often inconsistent activities; and second, that according to any definition, the scope of “social reproduction” changes according to historically specific forms of capitalism. Using two cases, one in central Peru from 1950 to 1970 and the other in the south of the Pais Valenciano (Spain) from 1970 to 2000, I suggest that the 'livelihoods' that people have to defend necessarily include both what we would call ‘the labour process’ narrowly defined as well as elements of the means of production that are needed so that they can pursue that labour process. Therefore, it is not only the capitalist who must ensure that the “working instruments are maintained” (Marx), but in these cases, the workers also have to do so. This effectively modifies the arena of what we would call “social reproduction” and, therefore, the politics associated with it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Gavin Smith, Universidad de Toronto Maynooth University
Departamento de Antropología, Profesor Emérito

References

Aruzza, C, T. Bhattarachya and N. Fraser, 2018 ‘Notes for a feminist manifesto’ New Left Review. 114 Nov/Dec 113-134.

Bhattecharya, Tithi. 2017: Social reproduction theory: remapping class, recentering oppression. Pluto, London.

Bourdieu, Pierre & J-C Passeron, 1977: Reproduction in education society and culture. Sage. NYC.

Burawoy, Michael. 1985: The politics of production. Verso. London.

Davis, Mike. 2007 Planet of Slums. Verso. London

Denning, Michael. 2010: “Wageless life” New Left Review.56 Nov-Dec

Federici, Silvia. 2012: Revolution at point zero: housework, reproduction and feminist struggle. PM Press. Oakland.

Fraser, Nancy. 2016: “Contradictions of capital and care” New Left Review 100: 99-117

Gimenez, Martha. 2018: “Capitalist social reproduction: the contradiction between production and social reproduction under capitalism.” Vidal, M, T. Smith, T. Rotta & P.Prew (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Karl Marx. [Online publication]

Hobsbawm, E.J. 1974: “Peasant land occupations” Past and Present. 62. 120-52.

Katz, Cindi. 2001: “Vagabond capitalism and the necessity of social reproduction” Antipode 709-20

Marx, Karl. 1976: Capital Vol I. trans. Ben Fowkes. Penguin, Harmondsworth

Mohandesi, Salar and Emma Teitelman. 2017: “Without reserves” in Bhattecharya op cit.

Moody, Kim. 1997: Workers in a lean world: unions in the international political economy. Verso. London.

Narotzky, Susana y AUTHOR. 2010: Luchas inmediatas: gente, power y espacio en la Espana rural. PUV. Valencia

Pahl, Ray. 1984: Divisions of Labour. Blackwell. Oxford.

AUTHOR 2014: Intellectuals and (Counter-) Politics: Essays in Historical Realism. Oxford Berghahn.

AUTHOR 2018: “Rethinking social reproduction in an era of the dominance of finance capital.” In Andreotti, A. D. Benassi & Y. Kazepov (eds): Western capitalism in transition.

Smith, Neil. 1996: The new urban frontier: gentrification and the revanchist city. Routledge, London.

Standing, Guy. 2011: The precariat: the new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic, London.

Webber, Jeffrey. 2015: “The indigenous community as ‘living organism’: José Carlos Mariátegui, romantic Marxism, and extractive capitalism in the Andes.” Theory and Society 44: 575-98.

Published
2020-07-07
How to Cite
Smith, G. (2020). Reflections on the changing sphere of social reproduction and class struggle: cases from Peru and Spain. Cuadernos De antropología Social, (51). https://doi.org/10.34096/cas.i51.6675