Confidence and suspicion in the field of security

Notes on the office of interviewing police officers

  • Florencia Rodriguez IDACOR - CONICET - UNC / UNVM
  • Natalia Sofía Castro CONICET / UNVM
Keywords: Police, Metodology, Security policies, Interview, Córdoba

Abstract

This article has the objective of making a series of methodological reflections on our experiences as researchers in the field of security. We explain some problematic knots around the office of qualitatively investigating in direct contact with the police, partly to open debates and discussions within the field of social sciences, but also as a reflexivity exercise for our ongoing investigations. We anticipate that the spirit of the article attempts to resolve some aspects of "access" to field work within the police institution, stressing the relationship between the alleged opacity and the predisposition of its agents to meet us and answer our questions. To do so, we address some moments of our research that allow us to identify and reflect on our strategies to build trust and some misunderstandings that gave rise to expressions of suspicion about ourselves and our intentions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Florencia Rodriguez, IDACOR - CONICET - UNC / UNVM
Es Licenciada en Sociología (UNVM) y becaria doctoral (IDACOR-CONICET). Se encuentra realizando la Especialización en Producción y Análisis de Información para Políticas Públicas y el Doctorado en Ciencias Antropológicas (UNC). Es miembro del Grupo de Estudios sobre Seguridad y Policía (GESyP) y docente en IAPCS-UNVM.
Natalia Sofía Castro, CONICET / UNVM
Es Licenciada en Sociología (UNVM), becaria doctoral del CONICET realizando su Doctorado en ciencias sociales (UBA). Es docente de la Licenciatura en Seguridad (UNVM). Es miembro del Grupo de Estudios sobre Seguridad y Policía (GESyP).
Published
2021-03-11
How to Cite
Rodriguez, F., & Castro, N. S. (2021). Confidence and suspicion in the field of security. RUNA, Archivo Para Las Ciencias Del Hombre, 42(1), 175-192. https://doi.org/10.34096/runa.v42i1.8472