Presentation

Filología is a biannual journal of the Institute of Philology and Hispanic Literatures “Dr. Amado Alonso” from the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters of the University of Buenos Aires. The journal operates as the Institute's organ for scientific dissemination, bringing together the work of professionals from different research areas (theoretical or empirical): grammar and linguistics, Spanish literatures, foreign literature, and literary theory. Since its creation in 1949, Filología has included original and unpublished works related to the knowledge of language, literature and culture.

Each number of Filología may contain between two and four sections. The Articles section includes scientific papers on the different research areas persued at the Institute. The Dossiers section brings together sets of papers with a common subject, related to the objectives of the journal, with an appropriate title and an introduction by the coordinator(s) of the dossier. The Research Notes section includes contributions on different theoretical and methodological approaches applied to scientific work. The Reviews section offers critiques of recently published books that contribute to further the study of the different research areas developed at the Institute.

 

Peer review process

The original and unpublished manuscripts that are submitted will be evaluated by two or more external referees using a double-blind system, keeping the identity of the author and reviewers confidential during the evaluation process. If the evaluations do not coincide or have discrepancies, the Drafting Committee will request a new evaluation and the final decision will be made on the basis of the new opinion. As the last stage of the evaluation process, all the contributions that make up each issue of Philology are examined by the Editorial Board of the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters of the University of Buenos Aires, which makes the final approval of each issue of the journal. The authors will be notified of the decision to accept or reject the manuscript. Likewise, the text may be returned to them to introduce the modifications recommended by the evaluators within the agreed deadlines.

The Editorial Committee reserves the following rights:

  • request articles or other texts from specialists when deemed appropriate (these cases will also be subject to external evaluation);
  • reject collaborations that are not relevant to the thematic profile of the magazine or that do not conform to the style standards;
  • Establish the order in which accepted papers will be published.

 

Open access policy

Filología is an open access scholarly journal, meaning all content is freely available at no charge to the user or their institution. Users may read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without prior permission from the publisher or author. This open access proposal is in accordance with the 2001 Budapest Open Access Initiative ( BOAI ) .

 

Copyright and deposit Policies

Authors retain copyright and assign the journal the right of first publication. The work registered with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License allows third parties to use what is published, provided the corresponding reference is included.

Authors can deposit their published works in institutional or thematic repositories, thus allowing greater scope and visibility of their research. They can deposit both the pre-print version (draft before peer review) and the post-print version (final version after peer review but without the final layout of the journal) of their papers. This policy allows authors to share and disseminate their work effectively, while respecting the rights of the journal.

 

Anti-plagiarism policy

Filología maintains an anti-plagiarism and self-plagiarism policy for both electronic sources and printed sources to guarantee the originality of all manuscripts. All contributions are checked with anti-plagiarism software  (Plagium, Dupli Checker, Plagiarisma). If plagiarism or self-plagiarism is detected, the manuscript will not be considered for publication.

 

Ethical aspects

Filología adheres to the Code of Conduct and Good Practices established by the Committee of publication Ethics ( COPE ). In compliance with this code, the journal undertakes to avoid the existence of any conflict of interest between authors, reviewers and editors. A conflict of interest is understood to be the divergence between the scientific/academic work and the personal interests of any of the actors involved in the editorial process (authors, editors, external evaluators). All submitted text will be evaluated for its intellectual content. Filología adheres to the Declaration on Research Assessment ( DORA ) on the evaluation of research.

APC

Filología magazine does not charge fees of any kind for sending or publishing its articles.

Acknowledgement of Authorship

Those submitting a contribution for publication in this journal must ensure that the manuscript has been read and approved by all listed authors, and that each of them agrees with its submission to the journal.

In original articles, acknowledgment of authorship should be based on: 1) significant contributions to the idea and design of the study or to the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; 2) drafting the article or critically revising it for substantial intellectual content; 3) final approval of the version to be published. The different authorship roles considered are specified below and, when applicable, must be declared according to the CRediT taxonomy:

  1. Conceptualization – Ideas; formulation or evolution of general research goals and aims.
  2. Data curation – Management activities to annotate (produce metadata), refine and maintain research data (including software code, when it is necessary for its interpretation) for initial use and later re-use.
  3. Formal analysis – Application of statistical, mathematical, computational, or other formal techniques to analyze or synthesize study data.
  4. Funding acquisition ​- Acquisition of the financial support for the project leading to this publication.
  5. Investigation – ​Conducting a research and investigation process, specifically performing the experiments, or data/evidence collection.
  6. Methodology – Development or design of methodology; creation of models.
  7. Project administration – Management and coordination responsibility for the research activity planning and execution.
  8. Resources – Provision of study materials, reagents, materials, patients, laboratory samples, animals, instrumentation, computing resources, or other analysis tools.
  9. Software – Programming, software development; designing computer programs; implementation of the computer code and supporting algorithms; testing of existing code components.
  10. Supervision – Oversight and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution, including mentorship external to the core team.
  11. Validation – Verification, whether as a part of the activity or separate, of the overall replication/reproducibility of results/experiments and other research outputs.
  12. Visualization – Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically visualization/data presentation.
  13. Writing – original draft –​Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work, specifically writing the initial draft (including substantive translation).
  14. Writing – review & editing – Preparation, creation and/or presentation of the published work by those from the original research group, specifically critical review, commentary or revision – including pre- or post-publication stages.

Contributors who do not meet the authorship criteria should be included as “special thanks”. All academic collaboration roles are described in the CRediT taxonomy (hdlab.space/taxonomia). At the time of sending, all authors must be uploaded.

How to include this data:

They are added at the end of the article under a subheading:

Contribution of authorship roles

Juana María (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-xxxx-xxxx) and Susana Pérez (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-xxxx-xxxx) contributed to the conception of the idea and design of the study ; Nora González (https://orcid.org/0000-0003-xxxx-xxxx) participated in the research process and data collection; María Domínguez pl(https://orcid.org/0000-0003-xxxx-xxxx) contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data. All authors contributed to the writing of the article, approved the final version for publication, and are able to respond to all aspects of the manuscript.

 

Digital Preservation Policy

Filología is part of the institutional repository Filo:Digital of the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters of the University of Buenos Aires, which digitally archives and guarantees the preservation of scientific material. It is also conserved in the institutional repository of the University of Buenos Aires (Library and Information System of the University of Buenos Aires, Sisbi ).

 

Self-archive policy

This journal allows the deposit in repositories, institutional pages or others, of all versions of the article.

 

Availability of Research Data

Filología adheres to open research data policies (Law 26.899). It is expected that the data supporting the research results originating in the article will be archived in an appropriate public repository for sharing. Authors must report the availability of data by citing it at the end of bibliographic references or, otherwise, report the absence of shared data.

 

Data Deposit Policy

National authors must take into account that in accordance with Law No. 26.899 “Creation of Open Access Institutional Digital Repositories, Own or Shared”, in the event that their research results published in the article have been financed or co-financed with public funds They are obliged to publish their works and primary data in institutional repositories, their own or shared. The citation of the deposited data set must appear in the bibliographic references section of the resulting publication. Citing the data set allows authorship to be recognized and facilitates its location, validation and reuse, facilitates the metrics and impact of the data and favors the transparency of scientific research. Each data set and subset must be cited independently with its own DOI or similar identifier.