Nine Thesis About Universals according to the Policraticus and the Metalogicon of John of Salisbury
Abstract
In this paper we summarize the critiques to the masters of dialectic and their nine opinions concern of the nature of universals according to John of Salisbury’s Policraticus, VII, 12 and Metalogicon, II, 17-19. We establish their sources and recount Agamben’s interpretation of universals as maneries.Downloads
References
Agamben, G. (1990). La comunità che viene. Torino: Einaudi (reed. (2001). Torino: Bollati Boringhieri). Edición en español: Agamben, G. (1996). La comunidad que viene. Valencia: Pre-Textos.
Cousin, V. (1836). Oeuvrages inédites d'Abelard. Collection de documenta inédits sur l'histoire de France, lle. série. París.
Dal Pra, M. (1951). Giovanni di Salisbury. Milano: Fratelli Bocca editori.
De Libera, A. (1996). La Querelle des Universaux. De Platon à la fin du Moyen Age. Paris: Seuil.
Denis, L. (1927). La question des universaux d’ après Jean de Salisbury. Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques, 15, 425-434.
Dumitriu, A. (1977). History of Logic. Abacus: Tunbridge Wells.
Geyer, B. (Hrsg.) (1919). Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie des Mittelalters. Peter Abaelards. Philosophische Schriften. Die Logica „Ingredientibus”. 1. Die Glossen zu Porphyrius. Münster: Aschendorff.
Gilson, E. (1922). La Philosophie au Moyen Âge, vol.I: de Scot Erigène à saint Bonaventure. Paris: Payot.
Hendley, B. (1970). John of Salisbury and the Problem of Universals. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 8(3), 289-302.
Kneale, W. & Kneale, M. (1985). The development of Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lejeune, F. (2001). Pierre Abélard et Jean de Salisbury. Metalogicon, 2, 10. En Jolivet, J. (dir.). Pierre Abélard à l’aube des Universités. Actes de la Conférence internationale de Nantes. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes (PUR), 247-260.
Lejeune, F. (2009). Jean de Salisbury, Metalogicon, trad., intr. & notes F. Lejeune. Paris/Laval: Vrin/Presses universitaires de Laval (Collection Zêtêsis).
McGarry, D. D. (2009). John of Salisbury, The Metalogicon, translated by D, D. McGarry. Philadelphia: Paul Dry Books.
Peirce, Ch. S. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Price, Burks, A. W (ed) (1958) vol. VIII. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Pepin, R. E. (1975). The Entheticus of John of Salisbury, a critical text. Tradition, 31, 127-193.
Prantl, C. (1981). Geschichte der Logik im Abendlande, vol. II, Leipzig.
Raña Dafonte, C. (1999). El tema de los universales en Juan de Salisbury. Revista española de Filosofía Medieval, 6, 233-239.
Thompson, A. (1995). The Debate on Universals before Peter Abelard. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 33(3), 409-429.
Van Laarhoven, J. (1987). John of Salisbury. Entheticus Maior et Minor, ed. & trad. J. Van Laarhoven. 3 vols. Leiden: Brill (Studien und Texte zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters 17).
Webb, C. C. J. (1932). John of Salisbury. London: Methuen Publishing.
1. The authors who publish in this magazine accept the following conditions:
-
They retain the copyright and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
-
They can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this magazine (eg. include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
-
They are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages).
2. AutoArchive Conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to distribute post-print electronic versions of their manuscripts because it promotes their circulation, a possible increase of quotation and a major reach among the Academic community. Color RoMEO: blue.
