Excerpta de uniformitate et difformitate: A Physical-Matemathical Compilation in Ms. Paris, Bl. De l’Arsenal, Lat. 522 Unknown Until Today

  • Daniel A. Di Liscia Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften
Keywords: Calculators, Natural philosophy, Mathematics, Manuscript, Method

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to present some new materials related to the development of the so called calculatores – tradition at the end of the 14th century in Paris. It is well known that this tradition emerged at the Merton College in Oxford about 70 years before and proposed a new approach to natural philosophy or “physics” consisting in the generalized use of mathematical and “half-mathematical” methods of analyzing and discussing questions concerned with motions and qualities. The manuscript Lat. 522 of the Arsenal Library was entirely copied by a man called “Johannes Monachus”, who can possibly be associated with the famous philosopher and theologian Pierre D’Ailly. Besides other significant works, Johannes Monachus copied the tracts De configurationibus (by Nicole Oresme) and De latitudinibus formarum (by Jacobus de Sancto Martino). At the end of this last work he decided to complete the “latitude of forms” with “some further things” (cum quibusdam aliis), a short text which most probably he himself compiled using the Regulae by Heytesbury and other similar sources and to which the title Excerpta de uniformitate et difformitate may be given. The following paper gives a transcription of this short text, expounds its content and discusses its significance in the context of the tradition of the late calculators. In adittion, a full description of the manuscript is given.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashworth, J. E. (1973). The Doctrine of Exponibilia in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries. Vivarirum, 11, 137-167.

Bond, W. H. & Faye, C. (1962). Supplement to the Census of Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts in the United States and Canada, Originated by C. U. Faye, continued and edited by W. H. Bond. New York: The Bibliographical Society of America.

Borchert, E. (1940). Der Einfluss des Nominalismus auf die Christologie der Spätscholastik nach dem Traktat De Communication idiomatum des Nicolaus Oresme; Untersuchungen und Textausgabe. Münster: Aschendorff [Beiträge zur Geschichte der Philosophie und Theologie des Mittelalters 35,(4)]

Bos, E. P. (1985). John of Holland. Four Tracts on Logic (Suppositiones, Fallacie, Obligationes, Insolubilia). First Critical Edition From the Manuscripts with and Introduction and Indices, Artistarium 5. Nijmegen: Ingenium Publishers.

Clagett, M. (1953). The Medieval Latin Translations from the Arabic of the Elements of Euclid, with Special Emphasis on the Versions of Adelard of Bath. Isis, 44, 16-42.

Clagett, M. (1959). The Science of Mechanics in the Middle Ages. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Clagett, M. (1968). Nicole Oresme and the Medieval Geometry of Qualities and Emotions, Tractatus de configurationibus qualitatum et motuum. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Crosby, L. H. (1955). Thomas Bradwardine, His Tractatus de proportionibus. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Curtze, M. (Hrsg.) (1868). Der Algorismus proportional des Nicolaus Oresme. Zum ersten Male nach der Lesart der Handschrift R. 4º. 2 der Königlichen Gymnasial - Bibliothek zu Thorn. Berlin.

De Ricci, S. (1935). Census of Medieval and Renaissance Manuscripts in the United States and Canada (with the assistance of W. J. Wilson), 3 vols, (The American Council of Learned Societies). New York: H. W. Wilson Company.

Di Liscia, D. A. (1993). Definición y mensura del movimiento: Dos perspectivas de la filosofía natural escolástica en Nicolás de Oresme. En Magnavacca, S., D’Amico, C., Di Liscia, D. A. & Tursi, A. (Eds). Cuatro aspectos de la crisis filosófica del siglo XIV. Buenos Aires: Patristica et Mediaevalia, FFyL, UBA, 35-52.

Di Liscia, D. A. (1997). Velocidad quo ad effectus y velocidad quo ad causas: la tradición de los calculadores y la metodología aristotélica. En Di Liscia, D. A., Kessler, E & Methuen, C. (eds.). Method and Order in Reinaissance Philosophy of Nature. The Aristotle Commentary Tradition. Adeshot: Ashgate, 143-176.

Di Liscia, D. A. (2007). Zwischen Geometrie und Naturphilosophie. Die Entwicklung der Formlatitudenlehre im deutschen Sprachraum. München: München Universitätsbibliothek.

Federici Vescovini, G. (1983). “Arti” e filosofia nel secolo XIV. Studi sulla tradizione aristotelica e i “moderni”. Firenze: Nuovedizioni Enrico Vallechi.

Grant, E. (1957). The Mathematical Theory of Proportionality of Nicole Oresme (ca. 1320-1382). Dissertation, University of Wisconsin.

Grant, E. (1965). Part I of Nicole Oresme’s Algorismus proportions. Isis, 56, 327-341.

Grant, E. (1966). Nicole Oresme, De prooprtionibus proportionum and Ad paula respicientes. Madison / Milwaukee / London: University of Wisconsin Press.

Grant, E. (1971). Nicole Oresme and the Kinematics of the circular motion, Tractatus de commensurabilitate vel incommensurabilitate motu Celios. Madison: Milwaukee / London: University of Wisconsin Press.

Lindberg, D. C. (1975). A Catalogue of Medieval and Renaissance Optical Manuscripts (Subsidia Mediaevalia IV). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

Maier, A. (1952). An der Grenze von Scholastik und Naturwissenschaft. Die Struktur der materiellen Substanz. Das Problem der Gravitation. Die Mathematik der Formlatituden. Roma: Edizioi di storia e letteratura.

Maier, A. (1958). Bewegung als intensive Grösse. En Maier, A. Zwischen Philosophie und Mechanik. Roma: Edizioni di storia e letteratura, 148-186.

Maier, A. (1968). Zwei Grundprobleme der scholastischen Naturphilosophie. Das Problem der intensiven Grösse. Die Impetustheorie. Roma: Edizioni di storia e letteratura. McCue, J. F. (1961). The Treatise De proportionibus velocitatum in motibus attributed to Nicholas Oresme. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History of Science) at the University of Wisconsin.

Murdoch, J. E. & Sylla, E. D. (1976) Swineshead (Swyneshed, Suicet, etc.), Richard. In: Gillispie, C. C. (ed). Dictionary of scientific biography, vol XIII. New York: Charles Scribner’s, 184–213.

Murdoch, J. E. (1981). Scientia mediante vocibus: Metalinguistic Analysis in Late Medieval Natural Philosophy. Miscellanea Mediaevalia, 13(1) (Sprache und Erkenntnis im Mittelalter), 73-106.

Murdoch, J. E. (1982). The Analytical Character of Later Medieval Learning. Natural Philosophy without Nature. En Roberts, L. D. (Hrsg.). Approaches to Nature in the Middle Ages (Papers of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies). Binghamton / New York: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 171-213.

Pirzio, P. (1969). Le prospettive filosofiche del trattati di Enrico di Langenstein De habitudine causarum. Rivista critica di Storia della Filosofia, 24, 364-373.

Pluta, O. (1987). Die philosophische Psychologie des Peter von Lilly. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der Philosophie des späten Mittelalters. Amsterdam: Grüner.

Pruckner, H. (1933). Studien zu den astrologischen Schriften des Heinrich von Langenstein. Leipzig/Berlin: Teubner.

Robbins, F. E. & Karpinski, L. Ch. (1926). Nicomachus of Gerasa. Introduction to Arithmetic. Translated into English by Martin Luther D’Ooge. New York/ London: Macmillan Co.

Smith, T. M. (1954). A Critical Text and Commentary upon De latitudinibus forearm, A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Wisconsin.

Stenech, N. H. (1976). Science and Creation in the Middle Ages: Henry of Langenstein (d. 1397) on Genesis. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.

Sylla, E. D. (1982). The Oxford Calculators. En Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. & Pinborg, J. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambdrige: Cambdrige University press, 540-563.

Thorndike, L. (1958). A History of Magic and Experimental Science, 8 vols, 1923-1958. New York: Colombia University Press.

Wallace, W. A. (1968). The Enigma of Domingo de Soto: uniformity difformis and Falling Bodies in Late Medieval Physics. Isis, 59, 384-401.

Ward, T. R. (1985). The Theorist Johannes Hollandrinus. Musica Antiqua, 7, Acta Scientifica, Bydgoszcz, 575-598.

Wilson, C. (1960). William Heytesbury. Medieval Logic and the Rise of Mathematical Physics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Zuobov, V. P. (1958). Une fausse attribution: le De Instantibus attribué à Nicole Oresme. Archives internationales de l’histoire des sciences, 11, 377-378.

Published
2007-06-04
How to Cite
Di Liscia, D. A. (2007). Excerpta de uniformitate et difformitate: A Physical-Matemathical Compilation in Ms. Paris, Bl. De l’Arsenal, Lat. 522 Unknown Until Today. Patristica Et Mediævalia, 28, 25-53. Retrieved from http://revistascientificas.filo.uba.ar/index.php/petm/article/view/7826
Section
Articles