Self-Knowledge in Petrus Hispanus’ Commentary on the De anima
Abstract
In the Sententia cum questionibus in libros De anima I-II Aristotelis (c. 1240), attributed to Petrus Hispanus, the recovered Aristotelian understanding of the soul does not completely replace the old Neoplatonic frame. Indeed, the commentary holds the existence of self-knowledge from the very beginning of the existence of the soul, before the acquisition of species. The aim of this paper is to describe Sententia’s view on self-knowledge analysing it in the context of its eclectic psychology and epistemology. I will attempt to demonstrate that, although the commentary is set in an explicit Neoplatonic framework, Petrus Hispanus seems to be quite uncomfortable within this framework and becomes increasingly committed to the Aristotelian doctrine and its vision of science.Downloads
References
Kraców, Biblioteka Jagiellońska Ms. 726.
Venezia, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana Ms. lat. Z. 253 (1826).
al-Ghazzālī (1933). Algazel’s Metaphysics. A Mediaeval Translation. Ed. Muckle, J. T. Toronto: St. Michael’s College.
Ps.-Augustine (1865). Liber de spiritu et anima. Ed. Migne, J.-P. Paris (PL 40).
Anonymous (1966). Liber de causis. Ed. Pattin, A., Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 28, 90-203. Revised by Zimmermann, H. (2001): http://12koerbe.de/pan/causis.htm.
Aristoteles (1968). Analytica posteriora. Eds. Minio-Paluello, L. and Dod, B. G. Bruges-Paris: Desclée De Brouwer.
Avicena (1968). Liber de anima seu Sextus de naturalibus. Ed. Van Riet, S. Brill: Leiden / Peeters Publishers: Louvain.
Pedro Hispano (1941). Obras Filosóficas I: Scientia libri de anima. Ed. Alonso Alonso, M. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Revised edition (1961). Barcelona: Juan Flors.
Pedro Hispano (1944). Obras Filosóficas II: Comentario al ‘De anima’ de Aristóteles. Ed. Alonso Alonso, M. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
Aristóteles (1978). Acerca del alma. Trans. Calvo Martínez, T. Madrid: Gredos.
Aristotle (1931). On the Soul. Trad. Smith, J. A. Oxford: http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/soul.html.
Aristotle (2016). Aristotle’s De anima. Trans., intr. and comm. Shields, Ch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bäck, A. (2014). Aristotle’s Theory of Abstraction. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04759-1.
Bazán, B. C. (1969). “Pluralisme de formes ou dualisme de substances? La pensée pré-thomiste touchant la nature de l’âme”, Revue Philosophique de Louvain 67.93, 30-73.
Bazán, B. C. (1997). “Thomas Aquinas’ Critique of Eclectic Aristotelism”, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age 64, 95-126.
Bazán, B. C. (2000). “Was There Ever a ‘First Averroism’?”. In: Speer, A. and Aertsen, J. A. (eds.). Geistesleben im 13. Jahrhundert. Berlin / New York: De Gruyter, 31-67.
Bazán, B. C. (2002). “13th Century Commentaries on De anima: From Peter of Spain to Thomas Aquinas”. In: Fioravanti, G., Leonardi, C., Perfetti, S. (eds.). Il commento filosofico nell’occidente latino (secoli XIII-XV): Actes du colloque international de Florence-Pise, octobre 2000. Turnhout: Brepols, 119-184.
Brams, J. (1997). “The Latin Aristotle and the Medieval Latin Commentaries”, Bulletin de philosophie médiévale 39, 9-22.
Boer, S. W. de (2013). The Science of the Soul. The Commentary Tradition on Aristotle’s De anima, c. 1260 - c. 1360. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Cranefield, P. F. (1970). “On the Origins of the Phrase Nihil est in intellectu quod non prius fuerit in sensu”, Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 25.1, 77-80.
D’Ors, A. (1997). “Petrus Hispanus, O.P., Auctor Summularum (I)”, Vivarium 35.1, 21-71.
D’Ors, A. (2001). “Petrus Hispanus O.P., Auctor Summularum (II). Nuevos documentos y problemas”, Vivarium 39.2, 209- 254.
Ferreira, J. (2002). “A doutrina das duas faces da alma, em Pedro Hispano”, Cultura 14, 219-231.
Gauthier, R.-A. (1984). “Préface”. In: Sancti Thomae de Aquino Sententia libri de anima in Opera omnia. T. XLV-1. Paris: Vrin, 1*-294*.
Gilson, E. (1929). “Les sources greco-arabes de l’augustinisme avicennisant”, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et litteraire du Moyen Age 4, 5-107.
López Alcalde, C. (2018). “The Communication between Substances and the Unity of the Human Being in Petrus Hispanus’ Commentary on De anima”, Enrahonar. An international journal of theoretical and practical reason. Supplementary Issue, 375-385.
López Alcalde, C. (2019). “Maimonides’ First Reception in Latin Philosophy”, Mediterranea. International Journal on the Transfer of Knowledge 4, 35-56.
Meirinhos, J. F. (1996). “Petrus Hispanus Portugalensis? Elementos para uma diferenciação de autores”, Revista Española de Filosofía Medieval 3, 51-76.
Meirinhos, J. F. (2003). “Conhecimento de si e linguagem interior. Agostinho, João Damasceno e Avicena na Scientia libri de anima de Pedro Hispano Portugalense”. In: De Boni, L. A. (org.). A recepção do pensamento greco-romano, árabe e judaico pelo Ocidente medieval. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS, 301-317.
Meirinhos, J. F. (2005). “Comentar Aristóteles na primeira metade do século XIII. A Sententia cum questionibus in De anima atribuída a Pedro Hispano”, Revista da Faculdade de Letras - Série de Filosofia 23, 127-160.
Meirinhos, J. F. (2011). Metafísica do homem. Conhecimento e vontade nas obras de psicologia atribuídas a Pedro Hispano (século XIII). Porto: Afrontamento.
Owens, J. (1981). “A note on Aristotle, De anima 3.4.429b9”. In: Catan, J. R. (ed.). Aristotle, the Collected Papers of Joseph Owens. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Rohmer, J. (1927). “Sur la doctine franciscaine des deux faces de l’ame”, Archives d’histoire doctrinale et litteraire du Moyen Age 2, 73-77.
Sebti, M. (2000). Avicenne: L’âme humaine. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Silva, J. F. (2012). Robert Kilwardby on the Human Soul: Plurality of Forms and Censorship in the Thirteenth Century. Leiden / Boston: Brill.
Spruit, L. (1994). Species intelligibilis. Leiden: Brill. (Vol. I).
Toivanen, J. (2015). “The Fate of the Flying Man. Medieval Reception of Avicenna’s Thought Experiment”, Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 3, 64-98.
1. The authors who publish in this magazine accept the following conditions:
-
They retain the copyright and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
-
They can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this magazine (eg. include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
-
They are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages).
2. AutoArchive Conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to distribute post-print electronic versions of their manuscripts because it promotes their circulation, a possible increase of quotation and a major reach among the Academic community. Color RoMEO: blue.
