Introduction - Reception and Development of Aristotle’s Political Thought in Iberian and Latin American Scholasticism, 16th-18th Centuries
Abstract
This volume of Patristica et Mediaevalia (2017) presents a series of studies focused on the reception of Aristotle’s political and ethical thought in Iberian and Latin American scholasticism. The background of these studies is the research project “Reception and Development of Aristotle’s Political Thought in Latin America, 16th-18th Centuries”, supported by the Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation (Germany). We now proceed to a summary of the four articles contained in this issue.Downloads
References
Bejczy, I., Nederman, C. (eds). [2007]. Princely Virtues in the Middle Ages, 1200-1500. Turnhout: Brepols.
Bejczy, I. (ed) [2008]. Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages. Commentaries on Aristotle’s “Nichomachean Ethics”, 1200-1500. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Brieskorn, N. SJ. (2008). Spanische Spätscholastik: Francisco de Vitoria. En Christoph Horn, C. & Neschke-Hentschke, A.(Hrsg.). Politischer Aristotelismus. Die Rezeption der aristotelischen Politik von der Antike bis zum 19. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart / Weimer: J. B. Metzler, 134-172.
Briguglia, G & RIcklin, Th. (eds) [2011]. Thinking Politics in the Vernacular: from the Middle Ages to the Renaissance. Friburgo: Universitätsverlag.
Cenci, M. P. (2015). African Slavery and Salvation in the De instaurando Aethiopum salute of Alonso de Sandoval S. J. (1577-1652). Patristica et Mediaevalia, 36, 75-89.
Cranz, F. E. (1938). Aristotelianism in Medieval Political Theory. A Study of the Reception of the “Politics”. PhD Thesis. Harvard University.
De Boni, L. (2003). Ética e escravidao na Idade Média. En De Boni, L. De Abelardo a Lutero. Estudos sobre filosofia prática na Idade Média. Puerto Alegre: Edipucrs, 317-333.
Duarte Silva, L. (2017). O direito de resistência e o tiranicídio no pensamento político de Juan de Mariana: contextualização, apresentação e justificação do direito de resistência. PhD Thesis. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia da PUCRS, Porto Alegre.
Dunbabin, J. (1982). The Reception and Interpretation of Aristotle's Politics. En Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A. & Pinborg, J. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. From Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Disintegration of Scholasticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fidora, A., Fried, J., Lutz-Bachmann, M. & Schorn-Schütte, L. (Hrsg.) [2007], Politischer Aristotelismus und Religion im Mittelalter und früher Neuzeit. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Flüeler, Ch. (1992). Rezeption und Interpretation der Aristotelischen “’Politica” im späten Mittelalter. 2 Bände. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: B. R. Grüner.
Gitschker, T. (2002). Aristotelische Diskurse. Aristoteles in der politischen Philosophie des 20. Jahrhunderts. Stutgart/Weimar: J. B. Metzler.
Hanke, L. (1955). Aristóteles e os índios americanos, San Pablo: Livraria Martins.
Hofmeister Pich, R. & Culleton, A. (2010). Scholastica colonialis. Bulletin de Philosophic Médiévale 52, 25-45.
Hofmeister Pich, R. (2011). Recepção e desenvolvimento da escolástica barroca na América Latina, séculos 16-18: notas sobre a contribuição de Walter Bernard Redmond. Scripta Mediaevalia, 1-22.
Hofmeister Pich, R. & Culleton, A. (2012). Scholastica colonialis - Reception and Development of Baroque Scholasticism in Latin-American Countries, 16th-18th Centuries. The Two First Years of a Project. Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale 54, 21-42.
Hofmeister Pich, R. (2012). Dominium e ius: sobre a fundamentacâo dos direitos humanos segundo Francisco de Vitoria (1483-1546). Teocomunicacâo, 42, 376-401.
Hofmeister Pich, R. (2014). An Index of ‘Second Scholastic Authors’. En Hofmeister R. & Culleton, A. (Eds). Right and Nature in the First and Second Scholasticism. Turnhout: Brepols.
Hofmeister Pich, R. (2015). Scholastica Colonialis [Project Report] - Commission III: Latin Philosophy, Section 3 (SIEPM). Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale 56, 103-132.
Hofmeister Pich, R. (2015). Alonso de Sandoval S.J. (1576/1577-1652) and the Ideology of Black Slavery: Some Theological and Philosophical Arguments. Patristica et Mediaevalia, 36, 51-74.
Höffe, O. (2006). Aristoteles. Munich: C. H. Beck.
Horn, C. & Neschke-Hentschke A. (2008) [Hrsg]. Politischer Aristotelismus. Die Rezeption der aristotelische Politik von der Antike bis zum 19. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart/Weimar: J.B. Metzler.
Horn, C. (2008). Einleitung: Aristoteles und der politische Aristotellismus. En Horn, C. & Neschke-Hentschke A. [Hrsg]. Politischer Aristotelismus. Die Rezeption der aristotelische Politik von der Antike bis zum 19. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart/Weimar: J.B. Metzler.
Krynen, J. (1993). L’empire du roi. Idées et croyances politiques en France (XIIIe - XVe Siècle). Paris: Gallimard.
Lanza, L. (2013). Ei autem qui de politia considerat… Aristotele nel pensiero politico medievale (TEMA 71). Barcelona/Madrid: FIDEM.
Lanza, L. (2015). ‘The Scriptum super III-VIII libros Politicorum’. Some Episodes of its Fortune until the Early Renaissance. En Flüeler, Ch., Lanza, L. & Toste, M. (eds.), Peter of Auvergne, University Master of the 13th Century. Nueva York / Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 255-319.
Lohr, C. H. (1967). Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries. Traditio, 23, 313-413
Lohr, C. H. (1968). Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries. Traditio, 24, 149-245
Lohr, C. H. (1970). Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries. Traditio, 26, 135-216
Lohr, C. H. (1971). Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries. Traditio, 27, 251-351
Lohr, C. H. (1972). Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries. Traditio, 28, 281-396
Lohr, C. H. (1973). Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries. Traditio, 29, 93-197
Lohr, C. H. (1974). Medieval Latin Aristotle Commentaries. Traditio, 30, 119-214.
Lohr, C. H. (1974). Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors A-B. Studies in the Renaissance, 21, 228-
Lohr, C. H. (1975). Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors C. Renaissance Quarterly, 28, 689-741
Lohr, C. H. (1976). Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors D-F. Renaissance Quarterly, 29, 714-745.
Lohr, C. H. (1977). Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors G-K. Renaissance Quarterly, 30, 681-741.
Lohr, C. H. (1978). Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries; Authors L-M. Renaissance Quarterly, 31, 532-603.
Lohr, C. H. (1979). Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors N-Fh. Renaissance Quarterly, 32, 529-580.
Lohr, C. H. (1980). Renaissance Latin. Aristotle Commentaries: Authors Pi-Sm. Renaissance Quarterly, 33, 623-674.
Lohr, C. H. (1982). Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors So-Z. Renaissance Quarterly, 35, 153-256.
Lohr, C. H. (1982). Aristotelica Gallica: Bibliotecheca A-L. Theologie und Philosophie, 57, 225-259.
Lohr, C. H. (1988). Latin Aristotle Commentaries II: Rennaissance Authors. Florencia: Leo S. Olschki.
Lohr, C. H. (2010). Latin Aristotle Commentaries, I.1 - Medieval Authors, A-L (with the collaboration of Coralba Colomba). SISMEL - Edizione del Galluzzo, Florencia.
Lohr, C. H. (2013). Latin Aristotle Commentaries, 1.2 - Medieval Author’s, M-Z [with the collaboration of Coralba Colomba], SISMEL. Edizione del Galluzzo, Florencia.
Miethke, J. (2000). De potestad Papa. Die päpstliche Amtskompetenz im Widerstreit der politischen Theorie von Thomas von Aquin bis Wilhelm von Ockham. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Miethke, J. (2008). Spätmittelalter. Thomas von Aquin, Aegidius Romanus, Marsilius von Padua. En Horn, C. & Neschke-Hentschke A. (2008) [Hrsg]. Politischer Aristotelismus. Die Rezeption der aristotelische Politik von der Antike bis zum 19. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart/Weimar: J.B. Metzler. 77-111.
Pellegrin, P. (2013). Natural Salvery. En Deslauriers, M & Destrée, P. (Eds). The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 92-116.
Pyron, S. (1997). Nicole Oresme: violence, langage et raison politique. Florencia: European University Institute (Department of History and Civization).
Redmond, W. (1972). Bibliography of the Philosophy in the Iberian Colonis of America. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Restrepo, L. F (2010). Colonial Thought. En Nuccetelli, S., Schutte, O. & Bueno, O (eds). A Companion to Latin American Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 36-52.
Scattola, M. (2009). Domingo Soto e la fondazione della scuola di Salamanca. Veritas 54(3), 52-70.
Schütrumpf, E. (2011). Politische Schriften. En Rapp, C. & Corcilius, K. (Hrsg.). Aristoteles - Handbuch. Leben - Werk - Wirkung. Stuttgart/Wiemar: J. B. Metzler.
Tosi, G. (2002). La Teoria della schiavitù naturale nel dibattito sul Nuovo Mondo (1510-1573). Veri Domini o Servi a natura? Bologna: Edizione Studio Domenicano.
Tosi, G. (2004). Aristóteles e os índios: a recepção da teoria aristotélica da escravidão natural entre a Idade Média Tardia e a Idade Moderna. En De Boni, L. & Roberto Hofmeister Pich (orgs.), A recepção do pensamento greco-romano, árabe e judaico pelo Ocidente medieval. Puerto Alegre: Edipucrs, 761-775.
Tosi, G. (2006). Guerra e direito no debate sobre a conquista de América: século XVI. Verba Juris 5, 277-320.
Tosi, G. (2007). Bartolomé de Las Casas y la guerra justa de los indios. En Ildefonso Murillo (org.). El pensamiento hispánico em América: siglos XVI-XX. Salamanca: Publicaciones Universidad Pontifica de Salamanca, 639-649.
Toste, M. (2014). Unjust Laws and Moral Obligation in Sixteenth-Century Salamacancan Commentaries on Thomas Aquinas’ De legibus. En Hofmeister R. & Culleton, A. (Eds). Right and Nature in the First and Second Scholasticism. Turnhout: Brepols, 93-123.
Tuninetti, L. (2011) “V. Wirkung; Schulen und Epochen. 4. Scholastik. En Rapp, C. & Corcilius, K. (Hrsg.). Aristoteles - Handbuch. Leben - Werk - Wirkung. Stuttgart/Wiemar: J. B. Metzler.
1. The authors who publish in this magazine accept the following conditions:
-
They retain the copyright and grant to the magazine the right of the first publication, with the work registered under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows third parties to use what is published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and the first publication in this magazine.
-
They can make other independent and additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this magazine (eg. include it in an institutional repository or publish it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
-
They are allowed and recommended to publish their work on the Internet (for example on institutional or personal pages).
2. AutoArchive Conditions. Authors are allowed and encouraged to distribute post-print electronic versions of their manuscripts because it promotes their circulation, a possible increase of quotation and a major reach among the Academic community. Color RoMEO: blue.
